Understanding the Differences Between FUE and FUT Hair Transplants: Choosing the Right Fit for You

FUE vs. FUT: How to know which could the right treatment for you?

By Afrina Ghazali | January 5th, 2024

Hair loss is a common concern for many individuals, and as technology advances, various hair restoration techniques have emerged. Two popular methods are Follicular Unit Extraction (FUE) and Follicular Unit Transplantation (FUT). Each technique has its own set of advantages and considerations, and determining the right fit depends on individual factors. In this article, we will explore the differences between FUE and FUT and provide insights on how to decide which method may be a good fit for your unique situation.

Follicular Unit Extraction (FUE):

FUE is a minimally invasive hair transplant technique that involves harvesting individual hair follicles from the donor area, typically the back or sides of the scalp. This method is known for leaving tiny, dot-like scars that are less noticeable than the linear scar associated with FUT. FUE is performed using a specialized punch tool to extract individual grafts, which are then transplanted to the recipient area.

Advantages of FUE:

✤ Minimal scarring and no linear scar.

✤ Faster recovery time compared to FUT.

✤ Suitable for individuals with a tight scalp or those who prefer shorter haircuts.


✤ Limited graft yield per session.

✤ May be more time-consuming and expensive than FUT for large-scale transplants.

Follicular Unit Transplantation (FUT):

FUT, also known as strip harvesting, involves removing a strip of tissue from the donor area, dissecting it into individual grafts, and then transplanting them into the recipient area. This technique allows for the harvesting of a larger number of grafts in a single session, making it suitable for those requiring extensive hair restoration.

Advantages of FUT:

✤ Higher graft yield in a single session.

✤ More cost-effective for larger transplant sessions.

✤ Well-suited for individuals with advanced hair loss.


✤ Leaves a linear scar, which may be noticeable if the hair is cut short.

✤ Longer recovery time compared to FUE.

How to Determine the Right Fit:

☸ Degree of Hair Loss: FUE is often recommended for individuals with mild to moderate hair loss, while FUT may be more suitable for those with advanced hair loss requiring a larger number of grafts.

☸ Scarring Concerns: If minimizing visible scarring is a priority, FUE is generally preferred. However, if a linear scar is acceptable or can be easily concealed, FUT may be a viable option.

☸ Budget and Time Constraints: FUE tends to be more expensive and time-consuming, especially for large transplant sessions. Consider your budget and the time you can commit to the procedure.

☸ Personal Preferences: Factors such as hairstyle preferences, willingness to undergo a more invasive procedure, and desired recovery time should also be taken into account.

Choosing between FUE and FUT requires careful consideration of individual factors, preferences, and the extent of hair loss. Consulting with a qualified hair transplant surgeon is crucial to assess your specific situation and determine the most suitable technique. Both FUE and FUT have proven successful in restoring natural-looking hair, and the right choice can lead to a positive and satisfying outcome for individuals seeking hair restoration.

Click here to see if there are any FUE hair treatments or here for FUT hair treatments available on our website

You might also like